Party-Appointed Expert vs Court-Appointed Expert in the UAE: Two Different Roles
UAE litigation and arbitration regularly turn on technical questions a judge cannot resolve alone: how a loss was calculated, whether a financial statement was manipulated, what a piece of land or a business was actually worth on a given date. When a case needs that kind of technical input, UAE procedure relies on two distinct categories of expert, and confusing the two is a common and costly mistake for businesses new to UAE litigation. A court-appointed expert is assigned directly by the judge as an independent, neutral party. A party-appointed expert is engaged privately by one side of the dispute to support that side’s position. Both can appear in the same case, they are treated very differently by the court, and understanding which one a business needs, and when, matters well before a claim is ever filed.
What Is a Court-Appointed Expert in UAE Litigation?
A court-appointed expert is selected and instructed by the judge, not by either litigant. Once a judge decides a case requires specialised input, whether that is a forensic accounting review, an engineering assessment, or a business valuation, the court assigns the matter to an expert drawn from an official register rather than allowing either side to choose who examines the evidence.
In Dubai, that register has historically operated under Law No. 13 of 2020 Regulating the Practice of the Expert Witness Profession before Judicial Authorities, which set the qualification, licensing, and conduct standards for anyone listed on the roll of experts available to Dubai’s judicial bodies. In August 2025, Dubai issued Law No. 11 of 2025 establishing the Dubai Judicial Expertise Centre as a dedicated public institution under the Dubai Judicial Council.
Under the mechanism this Centre introduces, expert appointment requests from judicial authorities are now channelled through it, with the Centre assigning either an in-house expert or a private-sector expert from the official registry, rather than the assignment running directly through Dubai Courts as before. Law No. 13 of 2020 continues to govern who qualifies to sit on that registry in the first place, so the underlying eligibility and conduct framework has not changed, even though the appointment mechanism itself has moved to the new Centre during the transitional period the law sets out. At the federal level, the practice of expert witness work before judicial authorities more broadly is governed by Federal Decree-Law No. 21 of 2022, supported by Cabinet Decision No. 17 of 2024, which sets registration qualifications and the professional code of conduct experts across the UAE are expected to follow.
Once appointed, a court expert does not represent either litigant. Their role is to examine the evidence, often meeting with both parties and reviewing documents submitted by each side, and produce a written report addressed to the court. That report becomes part of the case file and typically forms the technical backbone the judge relies on when reaching a decision on the disputed issue.
Need Expert Advice?
Contact the team at Farahat & Co. for professional support and expert insights for businesses operating in the UAE.
What Is a Party-Appointed Expert in UAE Litigation?
A party-appointed expert is engaged privately, usually through legal counsel, by one side of a dispute. Unlike a court-appointed expert, there is no judicial selection process. A business or individual simply instructs a qualified professional, often but not always someone also listed on a recognised expert roll, to review the facts of the case and prepare an opinion or report supporting that party’s position.
A party-appointed expert’s report can be submitted to the court alongside the pleadings, used to brief legal counsel before a hearing, or filed specifically to challenge or respond to a court-appointed expert’s findings. Because the party-appointed expert is retained and paid by one side, their report is inherently associated with that side’s case theory, even where the underlying analysis is technically sound and professionally prepared.
How Appointment Actually Works: Court Expert vs Party Expert
| Factor | Court-Appointed Expert | Party-Appointed Expert |
|---|---|---|
| Who selects the expert | The judge, from the official roll of experts | The litigant or their legal counsel, directly |
| Governing framework | Law No. 13 of 2020 (Dubai roll eligibility), Federal Decree-Law No. 21 of 2022 and Cabinet Decision No. 17 of 2024 (federal registration and conduct), appointment now channelled through the Dubai Judicial Expertise Centre under Law No. 11 of 2025 | No judicial selection process; engaged under a private instruction or retainer |
| Who the expert owes duties to | The court, as an independent and neutral party | Primarily the instructing party, subject to general professional standards |
| Report submitted to | The court, as part of the official case file | The instructing party, who then decides whether and how to use it in proceedings |
| Typical cost arrangement | Court fees, often shared between the parties or allocated by the judge | Paid directly by the instructing party |
Which Report Carries More Weight in a UAE Court?
This is where the distinction matters most in practice. A court-appointed expert’s report is generally treated as more objective and carries more evidentiary weight, because it was produced by a neutral party selected by the judge rather than chosen and paid by one side of the dispute. Judges routinely rely heavily on the findings of a court-appointed expert when reaching a decision on the technical issue in question, and departing from those findings without a strong, specific, and well-evidenced reason is unusual.
A party-appointed expert’s report does not carry the same automatic weight. Because the report is prepared for, and paid by, one litigant, it is naturally viewed as advocacy-adjacent, meaning the opposing side and, at times, the judge, may treat it as a persuasive submission on behalf of that party rather than as neutral, independent analysis.
This does not make a party-appointed expert’s work worthless. A well-prepared, technically rigorous report from a party-appointed expert can meaningfully influence a case, particularly where it identifies genuine errors or gaps in a court-appointed expert’s analysis. But it is far more likely to be challenged, scrutinised, or discounted by the opposing party than a report produced under the court’s own instruction, and a business relying solely on a party-appointed report should expect the other side to attack both its methodology and its independence.
When Both Types of Expert Appear in the Same Case
It is common, particularly in higher-value commercial and financial disputes, for both a court-appointed expert and one or more party-appointed experts to be involved in the same proceedings.
The most frequent scenario is defensive: after the court-appointed expert issues a preliminary or final report, one or both parties engage their own expert specifically to review, critique, or rebut the court expert’s methodology, assumptions, or conclusions. That rebuttal report is then submitted to the court, sometimes accompanied by formal objections, to argue that the court expert’s findings should be revisited, clarified, or reconsidered before the judge relies on them.
A party may also introduce its own expert earlier in the process, before or alongside a court appointment, to build its case theory, prepare cross-examination points, or ensure its legal team fully understands the technical issues the court-appointed expert will eventually be asked to assess. Used this way, a party-appointed expert functions less as a competing voice and more as a technical advisor working behind the scenes to strengthen how the case is argued, even where their report is never formally filed with the court.
When to Engage a Party-Appointed Expert Before Litigation Begins
Businesses often assume expert involvement only becomes relevant once a claim has been filed and a court has ordered an expert assessment. In practice, engaging a party-appointed expert proactively, before formal litigation begins, is frequently the more valuable moment to do so.
A pre-litigation expert review is particularly worth considering where a dispute involves financial records, valuation questions, or a potential fraud issue that a business suspects may end up in court.
An early, privately commissioned report can help a business understand the real strength of its position before committing to litigation, identify weaknesses in its own documentation while there is still time to address them, and give legal counsel a clear technical foundation to build the claim or defence around. It can also shape settlement strategy: a business that understands the likely financial exposure or entitlement in a dispute, backed by a credible expert opinion, is in a far stronger position to negotiate before a court-appointed expert’s findings become the dominant reference point in the case.
Engaging a qualified expert early is also useful where a business anticipates that the other side will commission its own report. Having an independent, professionally prepared assessment in hand before a dispute escalates means a business is not reacting for the first time to an opposing party’s technical arguments once proceedings are already underway.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the main difference between a court-appointed expert and a party-appointed expert in the UAE?
Which type of expert report carries more weight in UAE courts?
Can a business hire its own expert to challenge a court-appointed expert's findings?
How is a court-appointed expert selected in Dubai?
Should a business engage a party-appointed expert before filing a claim?
Does a party-appointed expert have to be neutral?
Need Expert Advice?
Contact the team at Farahat & Co. for professional support and expert insights for businesses operating in the UAE.
How Farahat & Co. Can Help
Farahat & Co.’s registered court experts and forensic accountants act in both capacities described in this article: as court-appointed experts assigned to review financial, forensic, and valuation matters on the court’s instruction, and as party-appointed experts engaged privately to build, support, or challenge a case before or during proceedings.
Contact Farahat & Co. today to discuss your court expert or party-appointed expert requirements.
